A WRONG JUDGE
In each instance of a judge identified as wrong in this section, the
individual seeking to tell his/her side of the story has supplied
documentation for the charges made that this specific judge was wrong.
That documentation has been reviewed by mental health and legal
professionals and a consensus has been reached that the documentation is
sufficient to warrant the presentation of these perceptions of that judge.
The makeup of the reviewers will remain confidential to assure as objective
and reasoned an approach as possible. Confidentiality of reviewers
also protects the reviewers from any intimidation or potential retaliation.
The person presenting the judge as wrong has also paid a fee to cover the
costs of maintaining this website, entering the data, and the review
process. We also expect the payment of a fee to decrease the frequency
of irresponsible or irrational outbursts of personal pique or idiosyncratic
vituperation. We intend this to be a serious and considered effort to
give American citizens a voice in their dealings with the justice system and
to contribute to the accountability of judges.
Robert L. Templin
Margaret T. Waller
Charles W. Cope